[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Indexing Databases



:: Volume 8, Issue 4 (1-2021) ::
JAIR 2021, 8(4): 1-14 Back to browse issues page
Determination of Habitat Suitability Index and the most significant factors on distribution pattern of Capoeta capoeta in Roodbabol River, Mazandaran Province.
Azadeh Moradpour DerazKolaei , Sarah Haghparast * , Hossein Rahmani , Abasali Aghaei Moghadam
Abstract:   (3547 Views)
Presence-absence and abundance of each fish species in a river habitat depends on several factors and they prefer a specific range of each habitat factor. The present study was carried out to investigate habitat suitability index of Capoeta capoeta and the effect of habitat factors on its distribution and abundance in Roodbabol branch of the River Babolrood (Mazandaran Province). To do, fish sampling was performed at 20 sampling stations during December 2017 and January 2018 and 11 habitat factors were measured at each sampling station. Then, habitat suitability curves for each parameter and suitability index of each station were obtained using HABSEL software. Also, determination of distribution pattern of C. capoeta and its relation with the best habitat factors were surveyed using dbRDA analysis according to its abundance at each station in Primer+Permanova (Ver. 6).Based on the HABSEL results, C. capoeta inhabiting in Roodbabol prefers wide locations with low water flow speed, temperature between 14 to 18°C, average depth (22 to 30 cm), average altitude (140-180 m), average EC (260-300 μS/cm), small grain size of substrate rocks (100-125 mm), high level of dissolved oxygen (12 to 13 mg/l), and average salinity (1.5-1.7 mg/l) which are covered by bush and shrubs and shadow level is 41-70%. Also, dbRDA graph based on DistLm model indicated that factors of depth and width in the first order and water flow with EC in the second order affected the abundances differences of C. capoeta among various stations.
Keywords: Habitat Suitability Index, Environmental Parameters, Roodbabol River, Capoeta capoeta
Full-Text [PDF 711 kb]   (872 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/01/19 | Accepted: 2020/10/1 | Published: 2021/01/27
1. Abdoli A. 2000. The inland water fishes of Iran. Tehran: Iranian Museum of Nature and Wildlife. 378 P. (In Persian). Abdoli A., Eskandari S. 1999. Natural breeding of Siahmahi (Capoeta capoeta grasilis). Journal of Gorgan Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, 6: 38-51. (In Persian). Abdoli A., Naderi M. 2009. Biodiversity of fishes of the southern basin of the Caspian Sea. Abzian Scientific Publication. 242 P (In Persian). Anvarifar H., Farahmand H., Rahmani H., Nematollahi M.A., Karami M., Akbarzade A. 2012. Investigation of morphometric variation and differentiation Siah Mahi, Capoeta capoeta gracilis, in Tajan River. Iranian Journal of Biology, 25(4): 517-535. (In Persian).
2. Ardakani M.R. 2001. Ecology. Tehran: University of Tehran Publication. Iran. 340 P. (In Persian).
3. Armour C.L., Taylor J.G. 1991. Evaluation of the instream flow incremental methodology by United-States fish and wildlife service field users. Fisheries, 16: 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1991)016<0036:EOTIFI>2.0.CO;2 [DOI:10.1577/1548-8446(1991)0162.0.CO;2]
4. Armstrong J.D., Kemp P.S., Kennedy G.I.A., Ladle M., Milner N.J. 2003. Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in river and streams. Fisheries Research, 62: 143-170. [DOI:10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00160-1]
5. Asadi H., Sattari M., Eigderi S. 2014. The determinant factors underlying habitat selectivity and preference for Black fish Capoeta capoeta gracilis (Keyserling 1891) in Siyahrud River (a tributary of Sefidrud River basin). Iranian Journal of Fisheries Science, 23(3): 1-10. (In Persian).
6. Beamish F.W.H., Sa-Ardrit P., Tongnunui S. 2006. Habitat characteristics of the cyprinidae in small rivers in Central Thailand. Environmental Biology of Fish, 76: 237-253. [DOI:10.1007/s10641-006-9029-0]
7. Brown S.K., Buja K.R., Jury S.H., Monaco M.E., Banner A. 2000. Habitat suitability index models for eight fish and invertebrate species in Casco and Sheepcote bays, Maine. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 20: 408-435. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0408:HSIMFE>2.3.CO;2 [DOI:10.1577/1548-8675(2000)0202.3.CO;2]
8. Chen X., Li G., Feng B., Tian S. 2009. Habitat suitability index of Chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) from July to September in the East China Sea. Journal of Oceanography, 65(1): 93-102. [DOI:10.1007/s10872-009-0009-9]
9. Coad B.W. 2020. Freshwater fishes of Iran, Available in www.briancoad.com.
10. Copp G.H., Vilizzi L. 2004. Spatial and ontogenetic variability in the microhabitat use of stream-dwelling spined loach (Cobitis taenia) and stone loach (Barbatula barbatula). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 20(6): 440-451. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00605.x]
11. De Kerckhove D.T., Smokorowski K.E., Randall R.G., 2008. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Sault Ste. Marie, ON (Canada). Great Lakes Lab. for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. A primer on fish habitat models (No. 2817). DFO, Sault Ste. Marie, ON (Canada).
12. Dolatpour A., Poorbagher H., Eagderi S., Javanshir A. 2016. A study on habitat preferences of Tuini fish (Capoeta damascina) using the habitat suitability index in the Kordan River. Iranian Natural Resources Journal, 69(3): 359-366. (In Persian).
13. Elith J., Leathwick J.R. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40: 677-97. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159]
14. Eskandari S. 1998. Investigation of some biological, ecological and parasitological characteristics of Golestan National Park Siahmahi. MSc. Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. 113 P. (In Persian).
15. Gholizadeh M., Patimar R., Harsij M. 2018. Investigation of Selected Habitat Range of the Western Crested Loach Paracobitis hircanica (Mousavi-Sabet et al., 2015) in the Zarin-Gol River, Golestan Province. Journal of Applied Ichthyological Research, 6(2): 1-12 (In Persian).
16. Gorman O.T. Karr J.R. 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology, 59: 507-515. [DOI:10.2307/1936581]
17. Guay J. C., Boisclair D., Leclerc M., Lapointe M. 2003. Assessment of the transferability of biological habitat models for Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 60: 1398-1408. [DOI:10.1139/f03-120]
18. Hasanli A.M. 1999. Diverse methods to water measurement (Hydrometry). Shiraz University publication. Iran. 265 P. (In Persian).
19. Humpl M., Pivnička K. 2006. Fish assemblages as influenced by environmental factors in streams in protected areas of the Czech Republic. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 15: 96-103. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00126.x]
20. Jaramillo-Villa U., Maldonado-Ocampo J.A., Escobar F. 2010. Altitudinal variation in fish assemblage diversity in streams of the central Andes of Colombia. Journal of Fish Biology, 76: 2401-2417. [DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02629.x]
21. Johnson J.A., Arunachalam M. 2009. Diversity, distribution and assemblage structure of fishes in streams of southern Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 1(10): 507-513. [DOI:10.11609/JoTT.o2146.507-13]
22. Johnston N.T., Slaney P.A. 1996. Fish habitat assessment procedures. Watershed restoration technical circular No.8. University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Canada.
23. Jowett I.G., Hayes J.W., Duncan M.J. 2008. A guide to instream habitat survey methods and analysis. NIWA Science and Technology Series, No. 54, 121p.
24. Khani Sedhi M. 1996. Hydromorphology evaluation of Babol River basin. MS.c thesis. University of Tehran. Geography Faculty. (In Persian).
25. Lagler K.F., Bardach J.E., Miller R.R. 1962. Ichthyology. Library of congress catalog code number: 62-17463 printed in U.S.A. 545 p.
26. Leonard P.M., Orth D.J. 1988. Use of habitat guilds of fish to determine in stream flow requirements. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 8: 399-409. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1988)008<0399:UOHGOF>2.3.CO;2 [DOI:10.1577/1548-8675(1988)0082.3.CO;2]
27. Littlejohn S., Holland L., Jacobson R., Huston M., Hornung T. 1985. Habits and habitats of fishes in the upper Mississississppi River. U.S. Fish and wildlife service, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA.
28. Lotfi A. 2012. Guideline on rapid assessment of environmental features of rivers. Environment Protection Department of Iran Publication. 120 p. (In Persian)
29. Meehan W.R., Swanson F.J., Sedell J.R. 1977. Influences of riparian vegetation on aquatic ecosystems with particular reference to Salmonid fishes and their food supply. Proceeding of Symposium On the Importance, Preservation and Management of the Riparian Habitat, 9: 137-145.
30. Mikaeeli A.R., Abdoli A., Amini Nasab S.M. 2006. Physical structure of Madar Sou River in Golestan National Park. Gorgan Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 12(3): 100-110. (In Persian).
31. Naderi Jeloudar M., Abdoli A. 2005. Atlas of fish in the southern Caspian Sea (Iranian Waters). Iranian Fisheries Research Institute, 112 P. (In Persian).
32. Odum E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. 3rd ed. Saundera Co. 234 p.
33. Oberdorff T., Pont D., Hugueny B., Chessel D. 2001. A probabilistic model characterizing fish assemblages of French rivers: a framework for environmental assessment. Freshwater Biology, 46: 399-415. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00669.x]
34. Opperman J.J., Merenlender A.M. 2004. The effectiveness of riparian restoration for improving instream fish habitat in four hardwood-dominated California streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24 (3): 822-834. [DOI:10.1577/M03-147.1]
35. Palialexis A., Georgakarakos S., Karakassia L., Lika K., Valavanis V.D. 2011. Prediction of marine species distribution from presence-absence acoustic data: comparing the fitting efficiency and the predictive capacity of conventional and novel distribution models. Hydrobiologia, 670: 241-266. [DOI:10.1007/s10750-011-0673-9]
36. Platts W.S., Megahan W.F., Minshall G.W. 1983. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. (NT-138.Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of agriculture, forest service, forest and Range Experiment Station. 70 p. [DOI:10.2737/INT-GTR-138]
37. Porter M.S., Rosenfeld J., Parkinson E.A. 2000. Predictive models of fish species distribution in the Blackwater drainage, British Columbia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 20(2): 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0349:PMOFSD>2.3.CO;2 [DOI:10.1577/1548-8675(2000)0202.3.CO;2]
38. Price A.L. Peterson J.T. 2010. Estimation and modeling of electrofishing capture efficiency for fishes in wadeable warmwater streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 30: 481-491. [DOI:10.1577/M09-122.1]
39. Pusey B.J., Arthington A.H., Read M.G. 1993. Spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblage structure in the Mary River, south-eastern Queensland: the influence of habitat structure. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 37: 355-380. [DOI:10.1007/BF00005204]
40. Quist M.C., Rahel F.J., Hubert W.A. 2005. Hierarchical faunal filters: an approach to assessing effects of habitat and nonnative species on native fishes. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 14: 24-39. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2004.00073.x]
41. Rifflart R., Carrel G., Coarer Y., Fontez B.N.T. 2009. Spatio-temporal patterns of fish assemblages in a large regulated alluvial river. Freshwater Biology, 54: 1544-1559. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02200.x]
42. Rostami P. 2017. Evaluation of Habitat Suitability Index of Alburnoides eichwaldii, in Lavij River Noor city, Mazandaran Province. MS.c thesis. Fisheries Science, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University. (In Persian).
43. Rostamian N., Saeedpour B., Eagderi S., Ramin M. 2017a. Investigating habitat suitability of Keyvan spined loach, Cobitis keyvani Mousavi-Sabet et al., 2012 in Totkabon River (Sefidroud river basin) using generalized additive models (GAM). Journal of Applied Ichthyological Research, 4(4): 1-12. (In Persian).
44. Rostamian N., Eigderi S., Vatandoust S., Salar H. 2017b. Habitat use and suitability index of Capoeta Capoeta gracilis, in the Kalarud River. Journal of Animal Environment, 9(2): 141-146 (In Persian).
45. Samaee S.M.R., Mojazi-Amiri B., Hosseini-Mazinani S.M. 2006. Comparison of Capoeta capoeta gracilis (Cyprinidae, Teleostei) populations in the south Caspian Sea River basin, using morphometric ratios and genetic markers. Folia Zoologica, 55(3): 323-335.
46. Smokorowski K.E., Pratt T.C. 2007. Effect of change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems- a review and meta-analysis. Environmental Reviews, 15: 15-41. [DOI:10.1139/a06-007]
47. Tabatabaei S.N., Eagderi S., Kaboli M., Javanshir Khoie A., Zamani Faradonbe M. 2013. Analysis of the environmental factors affecting the distribution of the Loach (Oxynoemacheillus bergianus) in Kordan River
48. Iran. Journal of Fisheries, 66(2): 159-171. (In Persian).
49. Tabatabaei S.N., Hashemzadeh Segherloo I., Eagderi S., Zamani Faradonbeh M. 2014. Determining factor in habitat selection of Paracobitis iranica (Nalbant & Bianco 1998) population in Kordan River, Namak Lake Basin, Iran. Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 3(4): 1-9. (In Persian).
50. Thurow R.E. 1997. Habitat utilization and diel behavior of juvenile bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) at the onset of winter. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 6: 1-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0633.1997.tb00136.x]
51. Vadas R.L., Orth D. 2001. Formulation of habitat suitability models for stream fish guilds: Do the standard methods work?. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130 (2): 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<0217:FOHSMF>2.0.CO;2 [DOI:10.1577/1548-8659(2001)1302.0.CO;2]
52. Vinagre C., Fonseca V., Cabral H., Costa M.J. 2006. Habitat suitability index models for the juvenile soles, Solea solea and Solea senegalensis, in the Tagus estuary: Defining variables for species management. Fisheries Research, 82: 140-149. [DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2006.07.011]
53. Vosoughi Gh., Mostajir B. 1998. Freshwater Fishes. Tehran University Publication. 272 P. (In Persian).
54. Yu S.L., Lee T.W. 2002. Habitat preference of the stream fish, Sinogastromyzon puliensis (Homalopteridae). Zoological Studies, 41(2): 183-187.
55. Waddle T.J. 2012. Phabsim for Windows user's manual and exercises: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File
56. Report 2001-340. 288 p.
57. Zamani Faradonbe M., Eagderi S., Zarei N. 2015. Determination of habitat suitability index of Capoeta gracilis, Keyserling 1861 from Taleghan River. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal, 68(4): 409-419. (In Persian).
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradpour DerazKolaei A, Haghparast S, Rahmani H, Aghaei Moghadam A. Determination of Habitat Suitability Index and the most significant factors on distribution pattern of Capoeta capoeta in Roodbabol River, Mazandaran Province.. JAIR 2021; 8 (4) :1-14
URL: http://jair.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-637-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 4 (1-2021) Back to browse issues page
نشریه علمی پژوهشی پژوهشهای ماهی شناسی کاربردی Journal of Applied Ichthyological Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4624